July 2025

China leads the world in both steel production and sales. With an impressive annual output of approximately 1 billion tons, China accounts for nearly half of the global steel production. Following China, India ranks second with around 100 million tons produced annually. Japan and the United States each produce between 70 to 80 million tons, […]

This segment shines a spotlight on the latest trademark law cases from the CNIPA or local Courts in China, offering a glimpse into the evolving landscape of adjudication and prosecution trends and intellectual property policy shifts in judicial and administrative matters concerning Chinese trademark law, all drawn from the most recent decisions and rulings. Court:

Practice Trends This case was selected by Beijing High Court among the Ten Most Significant Cases of the Beijing High Court and the Ten Most Notable Cases Pertaining to Judicial Protection for Trademark Prosecution in 2024. It serves as a notable illustration of the thorough investigation of fraudulent evidence in cases of non-use cancellation of trademarks registered over

Case Number: (2021) Jing 0105 Minchu 42912 Case Summary Plaintiff: Takashi Murakami  Defendants: Alcon Company, Beijing Hengzhi Company, Shenzhen Junfei Company. Takashi Murakami is a highly regarded contemporary artist from Japan, celebrated for his impactful work on a global scale. Among his notable creations is the “Sunflower” series, which has gained widespread acclaim and recognition. 

Judicial Viewpoint in Detail 【Case Number】: (2018) Jing Xing Zhong 312   【Adjudicating Institution】: Beijing High People’s Court   In this case, all parties agree that the goods associated with the disputed trademark and the goods approved for the cited trademark are the same or similar. The disputed trademark features the Chinese phrase “五粮液年份原浆” (Wuliangye Vintage Original Liquor),

A recent court ruling from Beijing Haidian District Court has determined that a company, along with five other defendants, engaged in the manufacturing and sale of counterfeit switches bearing the “Huawei” brand, which constitutes trademark infringement. Huawei as the plaintiff initiated legal action against the six defendants, seeking an end to the infringement and requesting

If you create, sell, or import porcelain products—especially those with unique patterns or designs—understanding China’s copyright laws is critical to protecting your intellectual property . A landmark 2021 case, recognized as one of the Supreme Court’s Top 50 Typical Cases, offers vital insights into how Chinese courts rule on porcelain design infringement. This guide breaks