Andrea_liang

Seasoned IP Attorney & Litigator

Case Law: Douyin Awarded a Hefty Compensation of 83 million RMB for Infringing Meishe’s Copyright

Douyin Copying Editing Code of Meishe SDK In May 2021, Meishe Company discovered that the audio and video editing code within the Douyin app had been largely replicated from its Meishe SDK software, which is protected by copyright. Further investigations indicated that other ByteDance products, such as Jianying, Juyuan Chuangyi, Faceu, Tuchong, Qingyan Camera, Duoshan, […]

Case Law: Douyin Awarded a Hefty Compensation of 83 million RMB for Infringing Meishe’s Copyright Read More »

Judge Article: Genuine Intent to Use in Trademark Cancellations

法官说商标 _ “撤三”案件中“真实使用意图”的判断 High Standards for Evidence in Trademark Non-Use Cancellations The phrase “Cancellation for Non-Use” refers to a trademark cancellation initiated by the registered owner due to a lack of valid reasons for not using the trademark. This is commonly known as a “trademark cancellation for non-use” case. Recently, trademark applications in China have

Judge Article: Genuine Intent to Use in Trademark Cancellations Read More »

Global Patent Disputes Among Leading Steel Industry Players in China

China leads the world in both steel production and sales. With an impressive annual output of approximately 1 billion tons, China accounts for nearly half of the global steel production. Following China, India ranks second with around 100 million tons produced annually. Japan and the United States each produce between 70 to 80 million tons,

Global Patent Disputes Among Leading Steel Industry Players in China Read More »

Court Case | Assessing Trademark Infringement Concerning Invalidated Trademarks – Robam Case

This segment shines a spotlight on the latest trademark law cases from the CNIPA or local Courts in China, offering a glimpse into the evolving landscape of adjudication and prosecution trends and intellectual property policy shifts in judicial and administrative matters concerning Chinese trademark law, all drawn from the most recent decisions and rulings. Court:

Court Case | Assessing Trademark Infringement Concerning Invalidated Trademarks – Robam Case Read More »

Court Case | Misleading and False Evidence in Non-use Cancellations Resulting in Significant Legal Rpercussions – FUSTE Case

Practice Trends This case was selected by Beijing High Court among the Ten Most Significant Cases of the Beijing High Court and the Ten Most Notable Cases Pertaining to Judicial Protection for Trademark Prosecution in 2024. It serves as a notable illustration of the thorough investigation of fraudulent evidence in cases of non-use cancellation of trademarks registered over

Court Case | Misleading and False Evidence in Non-use Cancellations Resulting in Significant Legal Rpercussions – FUSTE Case Read More »

Court Case | Faking Authorization as A Blatant Act of Joint Infringement.

Case Number: (2021) Jing 0105 Minchu 42912 Case Summary Plaintiff: Takashi Murakami  Defendants: Alcon Company, Beijing Hengzhi Company, Shenzhen Junfei Company. Takashi Murakami is a highly regarded contemporary artist from Japan, celebrated for his impactful work on a global scale. Among his notable creations is the “Sunflower” series, which has gained widespread acclaim and recognition. 

Court Case | Faking Authorization as A Blatant Act of Joint Infringement. Read More »

Court Case | Similarity Analysis: New Application Incorporating Non-distinctive Trademark

Judicial Viewpoint in Detail 【Case Number】: (2018) Jing Xing Zhong 312   【Adjudicating Institution】: Beijing High People’s Court   In this case, all parties agree that the goods associated with the disputed trademark and the goods approved for the cited trademark are the same or similar. The disputed trademark features the Chinese phrase “五粮液年份原浆” (Wuliangye Vintage Original Liquor),

Court Case | Similarity Analysis: New Application Incorporating Non-distinctive Trademark Read More »

Hefty Blow to Production and Sale of Fake Huawei Switches with RMB 20 Million Punitive Damages

A recent court ruling from Beijing Haidian District Court has determined that a company, along with five other defendants, engaged in the manufacturing and sale of counterfeit switches bearing the “Huawei” brand, which constitutes trademark infringement. Huawei as the plaintiff initiated legal action against the six defendants, seeking an end to the infringement and requesting

Hefty Blow to Production and Sale of Fake Huawei Switches with RMB 20 Million Punitive Damages Read More »

Porcelain Design Copyright Protection in China: 2021 Supreme Court Case Guide

If you create, sell, or import porcelain products—especially those with unique patterns or designs—understanding China’s copyright laws is critical to protecting your intellectual property . A landmark 2021 case, recognized as one of the Supreme Court’s Top 50 Typical Cases, offers vital insights into how Chinese courts rule on porcelain design infringement. This guide breaks

Porcelain Design Copyright Protection in China: 2021 Supreme Court Case Guide Read More »

Defending Trademark Non-use Cancellation

We have recently participated in multiple trademark non-use cancellation cases for foreign companies. We highly advise trademark owners in China to conduct regular audits of their portfolios to identify which trademarks may be vulnerable to non-use cancellation challenges and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk.  As of the end of 2023, China has a

Defending Trademark Non-use Cancellation Read More »