Trademark

Cleansing the Shadows of Bad Faith? Exploring the Rule and Its Exception in Article 44 of the China Trademark Law

Insights from the Hualing HUALING Saga on Trademark Transfers In today’s environment of increasingly strict intellectual property protection in China, trademarks have become more important than ever as key corporate assets. Nevertheless, malicious activities related to trademark registration, such as hoarding and squatting, continue to pose challenges that disrupt market order. Article 44, Paragraph 1 […]

Cleansing the Shadows of Bad Faith? Exploring the Rule and Its Exception in Article 44 of the China Trademark Law Read More »

The 2025 George Patton Metaverse Trademark Showdown: What Led a Virtual Car to Rack Up a RMB 1 Million Fine?

On July 21, 2025, the Hangzhou Intermediate Court delivered a second-instance ruling in the trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute concerning the George Patton brand Case No.: (2024) Zhe 01 Min Zhong 10520. This landmark case, recognized as the first involving metaverse virtual reality trademarks, has garnered widespread attention. The court not only upheld the

The 2025 George Patton Metaverse Trademark Showdown: What Led a Virtual Car to Rack Up a RMB 1 Million Fine? Read More »

Rising Refusal Rates for Trademark Applications in China: Insights into Changing Examination Standards and Strategic Considerations

Understanding CNIPA Stricter Trademark Examination Policies and Their Impact on Brands From 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), which oversees the Trademark Office (TMO) and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB), introduced significantly stricter examination criteria for new trademark applications. This policy change has led to a notable increase in refusals based

Rising Refusal Rates for Trademark Applications in China: Insights into Changing Examination Standards and Strategic Considerations Read More »

Triumph in Court: How Trademark Prior Use Won the Day in a Landmark Infringement Battle

Case Notes: A Landmark Victory in Prior Use Trademark Defense In the summer of 2024, an urgent matter interrupted my routine work. Zhejiang MEEC Company, a reputable enterprise with nearly 20 years in the electroplating industry, faced a significant trademark infringement lawsuit. A Beijing-based company, holding the registered MEEC trademark, claimed damages of US$10Million, threatening

Triumph in Court: How Trademark Prior Use Won the Day in a Landmark Infringement Battle Read More »

Chinese brands broadening horizons through international purchases

In recent years, an increasing number of Chinese brands have confidently entered the international market by acquiring well-known foreign brands. Today, renowned names such as Arc’teryx, G-III, Paladin, Bogner, and THG—previously celebrated worldwide—are now proudly included in the portfolios of Chinese companies. These brands have been integrated into a strategic framework developed by Chinese enterprises,

Chinese brands broadening horizons through international purchases Read More »

Trademark Battles Among Business Partners: Who Truly Owns trademark Rights to Barizam?

The Supreme Court delivered a final decision regarding the trademark ownership and infringement dispute between Heilongjiang Chuanfeng Co and Russia Balizam concerning the Barizam trademarks. The Court overturned the previous rulings from the lower courts, affirming that the Barizam series trademarks registered in China rightfully belong to Russia Barizamm Company, and has ordered the transfer

Trademark Battles Among Business Partners: Who Truly Owns trademark Rights to Barizam? Read More »

The MUJI Trademark Wars: 24 Years of Legal Battles and Implications for Foreign Brands in China

Introduction: Navigating a Commercial Paradox in China Retail Landscape In the bustling shopping centers of Shanghai and Beijing, consumers witness a unique intellectual property scenario unfolding firsthand. Two separate companies operate stores under the identical MUJI brand—Japan Ryohin Keikaku Co., Ltd. (Authentic MUJI) and Beijing Cottonfield Textile Co., Ltd. (Chinese MUJI)—located just meters apart yet

The MUJI Trademark Wars: 24 Years of Legal Battles and Implications for Foreign Brands in China Read More »

CNIPA Examiner Article:Guidelines for Demonstrating Trademark Use

The article was excerpted from the original version published by the examiner in the Fifth Examination Division, Trademark Office, National Intellectual Property Administration. The correct use of trademarks is essential to the core interests of businesses. By following standardized trademark usage practices, companies can effectively reduce risks related to unfair competition, confidently navigate administrative trademark

CNIPA Examiner Article:Guidelines for Demonstrating Trademark Use Read More »

Navigating the Deceptiveness Clause in China Trademark Law: A Practical Guide for Applicants

In today globalized business landscape, trademarks have become essential intangible assets for enterprises, playing a vital and irreplaceable role in market competition, with their value becoming increasingly significant. Article 10, Paragraph 1 (7) of the Trademark Law prohibits the registration and use of deceptive marks, stating that marks that are deceptive and likely to cause

Navigating the Deceptiveness Clause in China Trademark Law: A Practical Guide for Applicants Read More »

Exploring the Evolution of Trademark Usage Evidence Standards in China’s Non-Use Cancellation Cases

I. Key Transformations in Legal Structure and Regulatory Approach China intellectual property landscape is undergoing a major shift towards necessitating significant commercial utilization. An important aspect of this shift involves the China Trademark Non-Use Cancellation, which is addressed in the proposed amendments to the Trademark Law (CNIPA Draft Amendment, January 2023). These amendments fundamentally change the

Exploring the Evolution of Trademark Usage Evidence Standards in China’s Non-Use Cancellation Cases Read More »