In recent years, Chinese trademark law has undergone a notable shift, with greater focus placed on the genuine use of trademarks. As a result, there has been a marked increase in cases where defensively registered trademarks have been cancelled due to lack of authentic commercial use. Registering and maintaining a trademark requires considerable time and […]
Navigating the New Paradigm of Trademark Management in China Read More »
When assisting international companies entering the Chinese market, one of the most common and challenging issues we face involves registering trademarks that include or reference foreign country names. At first glance, the legal framework seems contradictory. Public campaigns and general knowledge of intellectual property law have taught many that a trademark identical or similar to
Following the discussion on essential trademark compliance—such as strict adherence to registered mark formats, statutory deadlines, and approved classification limits—this advisory focuses on the complex issue of maintaining defensive trademark registrations against Article 49 cancellations (Che San) under China Trademark Law. Although these registrations are not actively used in commerce, they play a vital strategic
Overview To tackle the increasing problem of trademark violations in China rapidly expanding e-commerce industry, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has introduced draft regulations titled Regulations on E-commerce Platforms’ Assistance in Investigating and Handling Trademark Infringement Cases (Draft Regulations). This initiative supports China wider intellectual property (IP) protection goals outlined in the Outline
Introduction: Fundamental Principle and Recent Changes China trademark system, like many worldwide, is based on the principle that trademarks must be actively used. A trademark is not just a registration certificate but a commercial asset that identifies the source of goods or services. To uphold this, Article 49(2) of China Trademark Law allows anyone—individuals or
Over the last ten years, China legal framework has made remarkable progress by enhancing IP protections, establishing specialized courts, and raising statutory damage limits. The government stance is clear: IP is a valuable asset, and violations will face penalties. Nonetheless, there often remains a considerable gap between the legal entitlement to prevent others from using
China offers unmatched business opportunities for overseas businesses. However, before selling products or promoting services, they must face a critical and growing obstacle: the trademark registration process. Recently, the rejection rate for trademark applications has surged to record highs. By early 2025, China had about 50 million active registered trademarks, with nearly 20,000 new applications
This article is a translation of a work by Professor Kong Xiangjun. The original text can be found at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzUwOTg0MTkwNA==&mid=2247486267&idx=1&sn=a92bcb198c7723302ecba094fee3ea85&scene=21&poc_token=HAFTBGmjqSmbXCdR7tezsfxsbrG2EbtMGK9BEFJX Key Issues in the Current Use of “Other Unfair Means” In current practice regarding trademark invalidation, the application of “other unfair means” faces several significant challenges: (a) Whether it should be applied alongside Article 4,
For international businesses aiming to enter the expansive Chinese market, securing trademark protection is a vital step. However, a common challenge arises when your carefully developed trademark is deemed “similar” to one already registered or pending. This situation is not a dead end but rather a strategic juncture that calls for thoughtful planning and effective
Insights from the Hualing HUALING Saga on Trademark Transfers In today’s environment of increasingly strict intellectual property protection in China, trademarks have become more important than ever as key corporate assets. Nevertheless, malicious activities related to trademark registration, such as hoarding and squatting, continue to pose challenges that disrupt market order. Article 44, Paragraph 1
