
AIGC Case Update: AI Writing Tools and Baidu Keyword Settings
Attorney Comments This case sets an important precedent for organizations working in the generative AI space concerning the management of digital marketing assets and the reduction of intellectual property risks. From a legal risk management standpoint, the court’s decision clearly establishes that advertisers cannot rely solely on automated tools provided by third-party platforms—such as keyword planners or automated bid management systems—to fulfill their duty of care. The judiciary has made it clear that the convenience of automation does not exempt businesses from trademark infringement claims. For AI developers and marketing teams, this ruling highlights a significant shift in compliance expectations. It is no longer adequate to depend on platform algorithms to review promotional content; companies must establish thorough internal review processes to identify third-party trademarks before launching broad keyword campaigns. The court’s dismissal of the defendant’s “automated tool” defense indicates that businesses are expected to maintain active awareness of the








